possibility






Although everything has a potential to be art,
I think something practical is not art.

I think that when people interpret things, anything becomes art.

I think it is a bit too bold to say that something is art without any intervention.




But I wondered if, in the past when there were no beings and only nature,
would that nature become art?



I believe that art fundamentally relies on human awareness.

Even a banana taped to a wall can be considered art.

Without our awareness and intention, they are just ordinary objects.

click and drag to play around


🍌

tape


tape

tape




🐞



long tape




long tape



5

-

2

=

3

+

H

1

1




The things that cannot be expressed in many ways is not art.

If I say 5 - 2, there is only one result:
3, not more or less than 3.


So I guess, kinds of science or physics is not art.
What people can change or control only could become arts.

We cannot change atoms such as hydrogen anymore.
We can’t turn mere hydrogen into another thing.


If we call that kind of thing art, we can’t control the word art.






I think an inclusive definition of the contemporary art is expressed by diverse people,
not considering ages, races, or like healthy or not.




In Japan, some shrines and temples are famous to tourists,

but they don’t actually go to see Japan’s normal houses,

because that’s so practical and it’s a part of daily life.




I think artworks are like living things, so they change along with what is happening in society.









Sport is not an art, because I think art’s aim is to express something, but sport’s aim is not to express, it is to win or do their best.



“Art appears — not as an object, but as a shift in how we see.”

(ここに絵や作品の画像を配置)



page Art



contemporary art theory (stories)